Multiple parties are often involved in personal injury cases, and various factors are to consider. One of the most important considerations is the concept of comparative fault. This legal principle can significantly impact a case’s outcome, as it determines how damages are awarded based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party.
Understanding how comparative fault works is essential for anyone who has suffered a personal injury and is seeking compensation for their losses. It will be helpful for you to know the impact of comparative fault in individual injury cases and what it means for plaintiffs and defendants alike. You can also contact a Toledo personal injury lawyer if you need legal assistance.
Impact of comparative fault in personal injury cases:
-
Determines the percentage of fault
Comparative fault is a legal principle that may be used to reduce the liability of one or more parties in a personal injury case. In states that follow relative fault rules, the injured party may be found partially responsible for their injuries, which can affect the compensation they are entitled to receive.
The court or a jury determines the degree of fault attributed to each party based on the evidence presented. If the injured party is found to be partially at fault, their compensation may be reduced proportionally to their level of fault.
-
It affects the number of damages awarded.
Comparative fault can impact the damages a plaintiff can recover in a personal injury case. The percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff will be deducted from the total damages awarded. For instance, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault, their damages will be reduced by 30%. It means that if the total damages awarded were $100,000, the plaintiff would only receive $70,000.
-
May limit recovery
In some states, comparative fault rules may limit the number of damages that an injured person can recover in a personal injury case. For example, in a state with a 50% comparative fault rule, if the injured person is found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident, they may be barred from recovering any damages. Even if the injured person is found to be less than 50% at fault, their damages may be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.
-
It may be used to reduce liability.
Comparative fault is a legal principle that may affect the outcome of personal injury cases. It refers to the degree of fault or negligence of each party involved in an accident or incident. In states that follow comparative fault rules, damages awarded to the plaintiff may be reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault, their damages will be reduced by 20%. It may result in a lower recovery for the plaintiff.
